Insights

Writing

Everything here is written from the dataset on this site. Where a claim rests on a count, the count links to the rows it came from.

The corpus, and what it can answer

Before the pieces, the map. Knowing the shape of what has been read is the difference between a claim you can rely on and a claim that happens to be true of one publication.

WhatCountWhat it can and cannot support
Arrangements read in full 1420 Counts within the corpus. Not a census, so not market shares.
Counted as distribution 1091 The rest are technology purchases, recorded and never counted.
Companies appearing 150 Company level facts. Absence means unread, never absent.
Types in the taxonomy 11 Definitional claims, which do not depend on coverage at all.
Named lists with a stated basis 4 Gap statistics against a population somebody else can rebuild.

The single largest source is one payments trade publication, and that shapes what the corpus is good for. Type mix and any single company's share reflect its coverage as much as the market: three in five arrangements it covers are one company supplying a capability to another, against closer to three in ten in company newsrooms. Claims about the shape of the supply side survive that. Claims about who leads it do not, and are not made here.

Pieces